Forecasting within limits

Hyndsight

It is common to want forecasts to be positive, or to require them to be within some specified range \([a,b]\). Both of these situations are relatively easy to handle using transformations.

Positive forecasts

To impose a positivity constraint, simply work on the log scale. With the forecast package in R, this can be handled by specifying the Box-Cox parameter \(\lambda=0\). For example, consider the real price of a dozen eggs (1900-1993; in cents):

    library(fpp)
    fit <- ets(eggs, lambda=0)
    plot(forecast(fit, h=50))

Forecasts constrained to an interval

To see how to handle data constrained to an interval, imagine that the egg prices were constrained to lie within \(a=50\) and \(b=400\). Then we can transform the data using a scaled logit transform which maps \((a,b)\) to the whole real line: \[ y = \log\left(\frac{x-a}{b-x}\right) \] where \(x\) is on the original scale and \(y\) is the transformed data.

    # Bounds
    a <- 50
    b <- 400
    # Transform data
    y <- log((eggs-a)/(b-eggs))
    fit <- ets(y)
    fc <- forecast(fit, h=50)
    # Back-transform forecasts
    fc$mean <- (b-a)*exp(fc$mean)/(1+exp(fc$mean)) + a
    fc$lower <- (b-a)*exp(fc$lower)/(1+exp(fc$lower)) + a
    fc$upper <- (b-a)*exp(fc$upper)/(1+exp(fc$upper)) + a
    fc$x <- eggs
    # Plot result on original scale
    plot(fc)

The prediction intervals from these transformations have the same coverage probability as on the transformed scale, because quantiles are preserved under monotonically increasing transformations.

comments powered by Disqus