The tourism forecasting competition

George Ath­anasopoulos, Rob J Hyndman, Haiyan Song and Doris Wu

Inter­na­tional Journal of Fore­cast­ing (2011) 27(3), 822–844

Abstract We eval­u­ate the per­form­ance of vari­ous meth­ods for fore­cast­ing tour­ism demand. The data used include 366 monthly series, 427 quarterly series and 518 yearly series, all sup­plied to us by tour­ism bod­ies or by aca­dem­ics from pre­vi­ous tour­ism fore­cast­ing stud­ies. The fore­cast­ing meth­ods imple­men­ted in the com­pet­i­tion are uni­vari­ate and mul­tivari­ate time series approaches, and eco­no­met­ric mod­els. This fore­cast­ing com­pet­i­tion dif­fers from pre­vi­ous com­pet­i­tions in sev­eral ways: (i) we con­cen­trate only on tour­ism demand data; (ii) we include approaches with explan­at­ory vari­ables; (iii) we eval­u­ate the fore­cast inter­val cov­er­age as well as point fore­cast accur­acy; (iv) we observe the effect of tem­poral aggreg­a­tion on fore­cast­ing accur­acy; and (v) we con­sider the mean abso­lute scaled error as an altern­at­ive fore­cast­ing accur­acy measure. We find that pure time series approaches provide more accur­ate fore­casts for tour­ism data than mod­els with explan­at­ory vari­ables. For sea­sonal data we imple­ment three fully auto­mated pure time series algorithms that gen­er­ate accur­ate point fore­casts and two of these also pro­duce fore­cast cov­er­age prob­ab­il­it­ies which are sat­is­fact­or­ily close to the nom­inal rates. For annual data we find that Naïve fore­casts are hard to beat.

KeywordsARIMA, expo­nen­tial smooth­ing, state space model, time vary­ing para­meter model, dynamic regres­sion, autore­gress­ive dis­trib­uted lag model, vec­tor autoregression.

Work­ing paper

Online paper


See my blog for the com­pet­i­tion based on this paper.