A blog by Rob J Hyndman 

Twitter Gplus RSS

Posts Tagged ‘journals’:


IJF quality indicators

Published on 17 May 2013

I often receive email ask­ing about IJF qual­ity indi­ca­tors. Here is one I received today. Dear Pro­fes­sor Hyn­d­man, I recently had a paper pub­lished in IJF enti­tled, “xxxxxxxxxxxx”. I am very pleased with the pub­li­ca­tion and con­sider IJF to be an excel­lent out­let for my work in time-​​​​series econo­met­rics. I have an unusual request, but I hope you will con­sider respond­ing. My research is judged by non-​​​​economists and IJF is not on their list of “qual­ity” jour­nals. It makes a sig­nif­i­cant dif­fer­ence in my research rat­ing and pay. Would you mind send­ing some objec­tive infor­ma­tion re the qual­ity of IJF that I can pass along to the com­mit­tee? And here is part of my reply: The IJF is ranked A in Aus­tralia (we have four lev­els — A*, A, B and C).† The IJF 2011 2-​​​​year impact fac­tor is 1.485. In 2010 it was 1.863. The five year impact fac­tor is 2.450. Com­pare this to the Jour­nal of Busi­ness and Eco­nomic Sta­tis­tics which has a 2-​​​​year impact fac­tor of 1.693, or Com­pu­ta­tional Sta­tis­tics & Data Analy­sis with 1.089. We are ranked 40 out of 305 eco­nom­ics jour­nals based on our 2-​​​​year impact fac­tor. We receive about 400 sub­mis­sions annu­ally, and pub­lish about 70 per year. But that includes invited papers. Of the

(More)…

 
No Comments  comments 

Establishing priority

Published on 6 May 2013

The nature of research is that other peo­ple are prob­a­bly work­ing on sim­i­lar ideas to you, and it is pos­si­ble that some­one will beat you to pub­lish­ing them.

 
No Comments  comments 

Blogs about research

Published on 9 August 2012

If you find this blog help­ful (or even if you don’t but you’re inter­ested in blogs on research issues and tools), there are a few other blogs about doing research that you might find use­ful. Here are a few that I read. Pat­ter — Pat Thom­son. The The­sis Whis­perer — Inger Mew­burn. The Research Whis­perer – sev­eral RMIT researchers. the (research) supervisor’s friend — Geof Hill. My Research Rants – Jordi Cabot. The Three Month The­sis – James Hay­ton. prof­se­ri­ous – Anthony Finkel­stein. Aca­d­e­mic Life — Mar­i­aluisa Aliotta. Help for New Pro­fes­sors — Faye Hicks. The Art of Sci­en­tific Writ­ing – Faye Hicks. Explo­rations of style– Rachael Cay­ley. shar­manedit — Anna Shar­man. Grad­Hacker – writ­ers from sev­eral uni­ver­si­ties. PhD Life – War­wick Uni stu­dents. PhD Comics — essen­tial read­ing for every PhD stu­dent, and good ther­apy. I’ve cre­ated a bun­dle so you can sub­scribe to all of these in one go. Of course, there are lots of sta­tis­tics blogs as well, and blogs about other research dis­ci­plines. The ones above are those that con­cen­trate on generic research issues.

 
3 Comments  comments 

Read the literature

Published on 3 August 2012

I’ve just fin­ished another reviewer report for a jour­nal, and yet again I’ve had to make com­ments about read­ing the lit­er­a­ture. It’s not dif­fi­cult. Before you write a paper, read what other peo­ple have done. A sim­ple search on Google scholar will usu­ally do the trick. And before you sub­mit a paper, check again that you haven’t missed any­thing impor­tant. The paper I reviewed today did not cite a sin­gle ref­er­ence from either of the two most active research groups in the area in the last ten years. Any search on the topic would have turned up about a dozen papers from these two groups alone. I don’t mind if papers miss a ref­er­ence or two, espe­cially if they have been pub­lished in an obscure out­let. But I will rec­om­mend a straight reject if a paper hasn’t cited any of the most impor­tant papers from the last five years. Part of a researcher’s task is to engage with what has already been done, and show how any new ideas dif­fer from or extend on pre­vi­ous work.

 
No Comments  comments 

Put your pre-​​prints online

Published on 2 August 2012

I have argued pre­vi­ously that research papers should be posted online at the same time as they are sub­mit­ted to a jour­nal. Some­times peo­ple claim that jour­nals don’t allow it, which is non­sense. Almost every jour­nal allows it, and many also allow the pub­lished ver­sion of a paper to appear on your per­sonal web­site. Today I dis­cov­ered a new tool (thanks to the IMU newslet­ter) which makes it easy to check a journal’s pol­icy on this. Check out SHERPA/​​RoMEO. It’s a very use­ful tool, but who­ever thought SHERPA/​​RoMEO was a good name needs therapy.

 
No Comments  comments 

Blog aggregators

Published on 15 May 2012

A very use­ful way of keep­ing up with blogs in a par­tic­u­lar area is to sub­scribe to a blog aggre­ga­tor. These will syn­di­cate posts from a large num­ber of blogs and pro­vide links back to the orig­i­nal sources. So you only need to sub­scribe once to get all the good stuff in that area. There are now sev­eral blog aggre­ga­tors avail­able that might be of inter­est to read­ers here. And this blog is now syn­di­cated on sev­eral other sites includ­ing those listed below.

 
1 Comment  comments 

Google scholar metrics

Published on 2 April 2012

Google has pro­duced another great tool for researchers, this time pro­vid­ing some met­rics on jour­nal cita­tions. Google Scholar Met­rics allows you to search on jour­nals rather than arti­cles, and to see the aver­age or median h-​​​​index for each jour­nal. For exam­ple, a search on “fore­cast­ing” yields the fol­low­ing results:

 
3 Comments  comments 

Following authors on Google Scholar

Published on 31 January 2012

A great new fea­ture has been added to Google Scholar Cita­tions. For those authors who have set up a cita­tions page, it is now pos­si­ble to get email alerts for any new arti­cles they pub­lish, or for any new cita­tions of their arti­cles. So you can track cita­tions to your own work this way, and stay up-​​​​to-​​​​date with key authors in your field. Set­ting up a Google Cita­tions page is super-​​​​easy and was already worth doing. This new func­tion­al­ity is another rea­son to do it. After all, as researchers we want peo­ple to read our stuff, so we might as well make it as easy as pos­si­ble for peo­ple to find what we write. To set up your Google Cita­tions page, go to scholar​.google​.com/​c​i​t​a​tions. To fol­low an author, find their cita­tions page and look for the “Fol­low this author” box at the top right of the page. Hope­fully, Google will add RSS feeds as an option in the future as I’d much rather get alerts that way then by yet more email in my inbox.

 
3 Comments  comments 

Refereeing a journal article

Published on 20 January 2012

I’ve writ­ten briefly on this before. For an excel­lent and more detailed dis­cus­sion of what is involved, there is a series of excel­lent posts on Pat Thomson’s blog: Ref­er­ee­ing a jour­nal arti­cle part 1: read­ing Ref­er­ee­ing a jour­nal arti­cle part 2: mak­ing a rec­om­men­da­tion Ref­er­ee­ing a jour­nal arti­cle part 3: writ­ing the feed­back If every reviewer fol­lowed her advice, my life as an edi­tor would be much eas­ier, and the qual­ity of research would be improved.

 
1 Comment  comments 

Researcher portals

Published on 26 November 2011

A researcher por­tal is a web­site that attempts to list all the pub­li­ca­tions of a given researcher. Some por­tals also allow shar­ing papers, inter­act­ing with other researchers, cal­cu­lat­ing cita­tion sta­tis­tics, etc. Every researcher wants their work read and cited, so these web­sites can be use­ful tools for get­ting your work noticed. They can also func­tion as a de facto home page if you don’t already have a per­sonal web­site. Con­versely, they can be a good way to find new work by researchers in your field. How­ever, unless a site pro­vides a rel­a­tively com­plete list of your pub­li­ca­tions, and cov­ers a large pro­por­tion of the research com­mu­nity in your dis­ci­pline, it is of lim­ited value.

 
5 Comments  comments