I often receive email asking about IJF quality indicators. Here is one I received today. Dear Professor Hyndman, I recently had a paper published in IJF entitled, “xxxxxxxxxxxx”. I am very pleased with the publication and consider IJF to be an excellent outlet for my work in time-series econometrics. I have an unusual request, but I hope you will consider responding. My research is judged by non-economists and IJF is not on their list of “quality” journals. It makes a significant difference in my research rating and pay. Would you mind sending some objective information re the quality of IJF that I can pass along to the committee? And here is part of my reply: The IJF is ranked A in Australia (we have four levels — A*, A, B and C).† The IJF 2011 2-year impact factor is 1.485. In 2010 it was 1.863. The five year impact factor is 2.450. Compare this to the Journal of Business and Economic Statistics which has a 2-year impact factor of 1.693, or Computational Statistics & Data Analysis with 1.089. We are ranked 40 out of 305 economics journals based on our 2-year impact factor. We receive about 400 submissions annually, and publish about 70 per year. But that includes invited papers. Of the
(More)…


